Person behind jail bars

Hostage Reports

Download 2024 Hostage Report

Download Latest Statistical Hostage Report

Structural flaws in the U.S. hostage enterprise—such as limited access to decision-makers and competing foreign policy priorities—have prolonged captivity for some Americans. In addition to targeted fixes, the Foley Foundation’s latest report calls for a full review of the decade-old system to address unresolved issues identified in prior reports, including funding gaps, lack of transparency, and delays in the wrongful detention designation process.



KEY FINDINGS &
CORRESPONDING RECOMMENDATIONS

Structural Inefficiencies Delay Repatriation

  • Dedicate annual funding to the Hostage Recovery Fusion Cell based on
    operational needs rather than FBI priorities.
  • Ensure negotiations to free Americans are insulated from other foreign policy
    concerns.
  • Conduct a whole-of-government review of the hostage enterprise to assess
    policies, resources, structure, strategies for prevention and deterrence, and
    support for families and returnees.

Levinson Act Criteria Are Not Treated as Binding

  • Amend the Levinson Act to specify which factors for determining wrongful
    detention are mandatory.
  • Codify that the “totality of circumstances” clause is intended to expand—not
    restrict—designation eligibility.
  • Issue policy guidance affirming that bilateral concerns must not override the
    imperative to bring Americans home.

Legal Permanent Residents (LPRs) Face Unequal Treatment

  • Define a clear wrongful detention designation pathway for LPRs.
  • Mandate consular support for LPRs in wrongful detention cases.
  • Train embassy staff and regional policy desks on LPR rights and responsibilities.

Exit Bans Are Not Covered by The Levinson Act

Amend the Levinson Act to include wrongful exit bans.

Designation Process Continues to Lack Transparency

  • Legislate clear triggers for a designation review (e.g., arrest notification, family
    request) and enforce the timeline for review and notification to the families, as
    codified in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025.
  • Create a formal process for families to submit a wrongful detention designation
    request, address government questions, share significant case updates, and
    track the progress of the review, such as through an online portal.
  • Allow for private wrongful detention designations known only to the
    government and the captive’s family to protect sensitive cases or negotiations
    with captors, while ensuring victims receive the benefits that a designation
    carries.

Families Bear Significant Financial Burdens

  • Study, tailor, and adopt the Israeli stipend model to support families of U.S.
    nationals unjustly held captive abroad.
  • Develop educational materials to help families address financial and legal
    issues.
  • Encourage state-level reforms to simplify conservatorship for families of
    hostages and wrongful detainees.
  • Address perceived inequalities in how cases are prioritized

Trusted Third-Party Advisors Are Critical

  • Update and provide families with a vetted resource guide of trusted advisors.
  • Respect family requests to include advisors in meetings and calls.
  • Establish an Advisory Council on Hostage-Taking and Wrongful Detention to
    inform U.S. policy development and better support families and returnees.

Diane Foley's signature
Jim Foley

Bringing Americans Home: 2024 Landscape Report

This paper describes the hostage and wrongful detention landscape for 2024 using descriptive and inferential statistics.

It explores the problem in terms of the known number of Americans held, the number of new cases during the past calendar year, number of releases, and number of deaths. This paper is not an assessment of the effectiveness of the U.S. hostage enterprise or U.S. hostage policy. The analysis presented here cannot be used to draw inferences about the efficacy of the U.S. hostage enterprise or U.S. hostage policy as both are outside of
the scope of this paper.


Bringing Americans Home: 2024

This report, conducted by the Foley Foundation, builds upon the Foundation’s previous assessments of the effectiveness of the 2015 U.S. Hostage Policy Review, the implementation of Presidential Policy Directive 30, Executive Order 13698, Executive Order 14078, and the Robert Levinson Hostage Recovery and Hostage-Taking Accountability Act. It integrates an examination of the landscape of hostage-takings and wrongful detentions of U.S. nationals using the Foley Foundation’s database of cases with a survey of family members and other stakeholders connected to 27 cases of hostages and wrongful detainees. Through confidential interviews with 62 participants, this report represents the perspectives of these U.S. hostages, wrongfully held detainees, their families, representatives, and advocates.


Bringing Americans Home: 2023

This report, conducted by the James W. Foley Legacy Foundation (JWFLF), consists of two sections.. The first section, “U.S. National Wrongful Detention and Hostage-Taking Landscape, 2022-2023,” used two JWFLF datasets containing information on 422 U.S. nationals held hostage or wrongfully detained abroad from January 1, 2001, through July 31, 2023, to discuss trends, releases, and detailed outcomes. The second section, “Wrongful Detainee and Hostage Perspectives,” was written by Matthew Heath and Jeffery Woodke, two former captives. Both perspectives provide ways to rethink U.S. strategy on wrongful detentions and hostage-takings. Their stories help to shed light on the toll of captivities and the importance of securing the freedom of all Americans.


Bringing Americans Home: 2022

From 2019–2021, the James W. Foley Legacy Foundation published a yearly assessment of the efficacy of the 2015 U.S. Hostage Policy Review and the implementation of PPD-30 and EO 13698. This report, an extension of those assessments, continues to examine how the U.S. government creates and implements policy in support of U.S. nationals taken hostage or wrongfully detained abroad as well as their families. Most importantly, this report seeks to better understand whether the new structures these policy changes have created help bring Americans home and offers nine recommendations to improve the government’s hostage enterprise.


Bringing Americans Home: 2021

This report, conducted by the James W. Foley Legacy Foundation (JWFLF), is a continuation of JWFLF’s assessments of the efficacy of the 2015 U.S. Hostage Policy Review and the implementation of Presidential Policy Directive 30 and Executive Order 13698. This study seeks to convey the perspectives of U.S. hostages, unlawfully or wrongfully held detainees, their family members, representatives, advocates, former senior military officials, and current and former U.S. officials. It, however, does not represent the perspectives of all former hostages, detainees, and their families, but only presents the perspectives of those who participated in this study


Bringing Americans Home: 2020

This report, conducted by the James W. Foley Legacy Foundation (JWFLF), is a continuation of JWFLF’s initial assessment of the efficacy of the 2015 U.S. Hostage Policy Review and the implementation of PPD-30 and EO 13698. This study was conducted from the perspective of American hostages, wrongfully held detainees, and their family members and representatives. It does not represent the perspective of all former hostages, detainees, and their families, but only presents the perspectives of those who participated in this study.


Bringing Americans Home: 2019

This assessment, conducted by the James W. Foley Legacy Foundation, (JWFLF) is the first non-governmental review of the efficacy of the 2015 U.S. Hostage Policy Review and the implementation of Presidential Policy Directive 30 (PPD-30) and Executive Order 13698 (EO 13698) concerning hostage recovery activities. This study was conducted from the perspective of former American hostages, family members of current and former U.S. hostages, and others detained unlawfully or wrongfully by a foreign government. This study does not represent the perspective of all former hostages, detainees, and their families, but only presents the perspectives of those who participated in this study.